Burnout in the Back, Distrust in the Lobby: Is the Exam Room Experience Determined by Who Owns the Practice?

Veterinary medicine in the United States is undergoing rapid transformation. Over the past decade, private equity investors and corporate groups have acquired thousands of animal hospitals, bringing new capital and efficiency—but also raising concerns about autonomy, culture, and costs. At the same time, veterinarians on the front lines face intense emotional pressures: dealing with distraught pet owners, shouldering heavy emotional labor, and coping with compassion fatigue in a profession now recognized for high burnout and even elevated suicide risk. This article examines how business structure and emotional stressors are intertwining in veterinary practice. We draw on recent empirical research and industry surveys, as well as unfiltered insights from veterinarians and clients on Reddit, to understand the feedback loop of stress and eroding trust. We conclude with evidence-backed strategies for veterinary professionals to protect their well-being and rebuild client relationships in this challenging environment.

Corporate Consolidation in Veterinary Practice: Trends and Impacts

A Wave of Acquisitions: In the past 5–7 years, corporate ownership of veterinary clinics has accelerated dramatically. By 2021, nearly half of all U.S. veterinary care revenues were estimated to flow through corporately owned clinics – up from around 10% of general practices in 2017[1]. Today roughly 25% of primary care veterinary practices (and about 75% of specialty/emergency clinics) are owned by large consolidator groups[1]. Well-known players include Mars Veterinary Health (owner of Banfield, VCA, and others), National Veterinary Associates (NVA), VetCor, and a host of private equity-backed groups[2]. This consolidation trend has been fueled by the attractive economics of pet care (resilient demand, strong cash flow) and the influx of investment capital seeking to roll up fragmented mom-and-pop clinics[3][4]. For retiring practice owners, selling to a corporate chain often means a much higher payday than selling to an associate – corporate bidders can offer multiples that individual buyers with limited financing can’t match. As a result, independent ownership opportunities for younger veterinarians have dwindled. As one veterinarian lamented, “The chances of becoming partner decrease every year as corporates buy practices”[5][6].

Autonomy, Culture, and Job Satisfaction: The shift to corporate medicine has profound effects on veterinarians and their work culture. While corporate groups can provide modern equipment, administrative support, and better benefits in many cases, they also introduce a profit-driven focus that can clash with the traditional ethos of personalized care[7]. A recent American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) study found that vets employed by corporate practices do report more perks like health insurance and paid CE (continuing education) – yet they also feel significantly more pressure to see high volumes of patients and generate revenue each day[8][9]. By contrast, veterinarians in independent practices reported greater professional autonomy and closer relationships within their hospitals. They had higher overall job satisfaction, citing factors like a more supportive culture, stronger mentorship, and even the ability to “fire” abusive clients when necessary[8][10]. In one survey, a majority of veterinary associates (55%) said they preferred working in independent clinics, despite many currently working for corporate employers[9]. Those in corporate settings were markedly less satisfied with practice management and turnover rates, and were more likely to be job-hunting for a different position – a clear indicator of strain[11]. In short, loss of control and cultural misalignment are common gripes as private equity ownership grows[12].

Burnout and Turnover: Emerging data suggests that corporatization may be contributing to burnout in subtle ways. A 2023 study reported that 21% of corporate medical directors described experiencing “high” or “very high” burnout, whereas independent practice owners were the group most likely to report low burnout levels[13][14]. Independent owners also boasted very high satisfaction with their careers (84% satisfied with their jobs, 76% with work-life balance, according to one survey)[14]. Meanwhile, corporate-employed vets, especially newer graduates, often describe feeling like “cogs” in a machine. Heavier appointment schedules, strict protocols, and decisions handed down by non-veterinarian executives can leave doctors and staff feeling powerless or undervalued[12]. Turnover is a predictable outcome: one study noted that associates in one-doctor-owned private practices were significantly more likely to stay in their jobs for the next five years than those in corporate clinics[15]. The profession is now grappling with a retention crisis, with frequent reports of young vets leaving their first jobs within a year due to disillusionment or exhaustion[16]. As we’ll see, this churn has downstream effects on client experience and trust.

Impact on Clients and Pricing: From the pet owner’s perspective, corporate consolidation is a double-edged sword. On one hand, the infusion of capital often means upgraded facilities, extended hours, and a wider array of services under one roof. Large groups tout their ability to standardize high-quality care across locations. However, clients are increasingly vocal about the downsides. Many perceive that prices at corporate-owned hospitals are higher, and indeed industry analysts have observed that private equity acquisitions tend to be followed by fee increases as the new owners seek a return[17]. Pet owners also worry about “upselling” – the sense that they’re being pushed into unnecessary tests, treatments, or wellness plans. This concern isn’t unfounded: veterinarians themselves acknowledge feeling pressure from corporate management to hit revenue targets, which can translate into recommending additional services or products in the exam room[18][17]. As a result, some clients come away with the cynical impression that “they only care about money.” Continuity of care is another casualty of consolidation. When clinics see a revolving door of doctors (or get absorbed into ever-larger networks), clients may struggle to form a lasting bond with any one veterinarian. If you rarely see the same vet twice, it’s hard to build the kind of trust that small-town family practices enjoyed. In summary, the corporatization of vet medicine has brought efficiencies and investment, but it has also introduced new tensions around autonomy, financial pressure, and the client-practitioner relationship. Break the cycle of stress, restore trust, and protect the bond at the center of it all: veterinarian, client, and animal.

Read the full article